<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cybercrime Law</title>
	<link>http://www.cybercrimelaw.org</link>
	<description>News and analysis on cybercrime, information security and information privacy legal and technological issues.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 12:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>CAN-SPAM Rules Modified</title>
		<link>http://www.cybercrimelaw.org/2008/05/13/can-spam-rules-modified/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cybercrimelaw.org/2008/05/13/can-spam-rules-modified/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 12:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dm</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Email]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cybercrimelaw.org/2008/05/13/can-spam-rules-modified/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday, May 12th, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) released a new rule under the CAN-SPAM Act.&#160; The new rule seeks to clarify some of the requirements CAN-SPAM imposes on senders of bulk email.&#160;

First, an E-mail recipient cannot be required by the sender to pay a fee, supply any information other E-mail address and opt-out&#160; preference, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cybercrimelaw.org/2008/05/13/can-spam-rules-modified/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CFAA Damages Calculation Includes Cost of Tracking Hacker</title>
		<link>http://www.cybercrimelaw.org/2008/04/30/cfaa-lost-includes-tracking-of-hacker/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cybercrimelaw.org/2008/04/30/cfaa-lost-includes-tracking-of-hacker/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 14:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dm</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Breaches]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[cfaa]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[1030]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Hacking]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Forensics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cybercrimelaw.org/2008/04/30/cfaa-lost-includes-tracking-of-hacker/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A decision from the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California held that the costs associated with the tracking and discovery of the identity of the person who stole proprietary information from a company does constitute &#34;loss&#34; for the purposes of calculation of damages under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA).
The dispute [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cybercrimelaw.org/2008/04/30/cfaa-lost-includes-tracking-of-hacker/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Courts split on whether making a copyrighted song available for download violates copyright law.</title>
		<link>http://www.cybercrimelaw.org/2008/04/27/courts-split-on-whether-making-a-copyrighted-song-available-for-download-violates-copyright-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cybercrimelaw.org/2008/04/27/courts-split-on-whether-making-a-copyrighted-song-available-for-download-violates-copyright-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 16:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Paulick</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cybercrimelaw.org/2008/04/27/courts-split-on-whether-making-a-copyrighted-song-available-for-download-violates-copyright-law/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160;&#160;&#160; A recent pair of federal district court decisions  are split on whether making copyrighted songs available for download violates copyright laws even when there is no proof that the copyrighted works were ever downloaded under 17 U.S.C.A. Sec. 106.&#160; An original article on this news is here:&#160;&#160;&#160; http://news.lp.findlaw.com/ap/high_tech/1700//04-04-2008/20080404145001_26.html.&#160; The two cases are:&#160; Elektra [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cybercrimelaw.org/2008/04/27/courts-split-on-whether-making-a-copyrighted-song-available-for-download-violates-copyright-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to Respond to Data Breach</title>
		<link>http://www.cybercrimelaw.org/2008/04/25/how-to-respond-to-data-breach/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cybercrimelaw.org/2008/04/25/how-to-respond-to-data-breach/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 20:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dm</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Breaches]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Forensics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cybercrimelaw.org/2008/04/25/how-to-respond-to-data-breach/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Data breaches happen every day and, unfortunately, we are getting so used to hearing news about the most recent breach that it no longer creates an interesting report.&#160; Most businesses of any significance will, soon or later, become a victim of some sort of breach.&#160; So the question becomes not whether you will suffer a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cybercrimelaw.org/2008/04/25/how-to-respond-to-data-breach/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Border Agents Can Search Laptops</title>
		<link>http://www.cybercrimelaw.org/2008/04/22/border-agents-can-search-laptops/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cybercrimelaw.org/2008/04/22/border-agents-can-search-laptops/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 18:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dm</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Forensics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Law &amp; Policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cybercrimelaw.org/2008/04/22/border-agents-can-search-laptops/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We have written in the past about the freedom of border agents to search laptops at the border crossing points.
A new opinion (PDF) in United States v. Arnold by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals dated April 21, 2008, confirms this trend by holding that customs officers may examine electronic contents of a passenger&#8217;s laptop [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cybercrimelaw.org/2008/04/22/border-agents-can-search-laptops/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is your return address?</title>
		<link>http://www.cybercrimelaw.org/2008/03/27/what-is-your-return-address/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cybercrimelaw.org/2008/03/27/what-is-your-return-address/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 21:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dm</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Breaches]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Email]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Vulnerabilities]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cybercrimelaw.org/2008/03/27/what-is-your-return-address/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many emails happily reach their final and intended destination.&#160; But there are some emails which arrive where they are not intended to. There are two recent stories which suggest not only how people should be careful what the &#34;TO:&#34; field in their email says, but also use some common sense.&#160;
The first story is about the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cybercrimelaw.org/2008/03/27/what-is-your-return-address/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Proposed FRE 502 is good for electronic discovery, but it is not going to drastically reduce the cost of litigation as the authors are hoping.</title>
		<link>http://www.cybercrimelaw.org/2007/12/16/proposed-fre-502-is-good-for-electronic-discovery-but-it-is-not-going-to-drastically-reduce-the-cost-of-litigation-as-the-authors-are-hoping/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cybercrimelaw.org/2007/12/16/proposed-fre-502-is-good-for-electronic-discovery-but-it-is-not-going-to-drastically-reduce-the-cost-of-litigation-as-the-authors-are-hoping/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 00:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Paulick</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Law &amp; Policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cybercrimelaw.org/2007/12/16/proposed-fre-502-is-good-for-electronic-discovery-but-it-is-not-going-to-drastically-reduce-the-cost-of-litigation-as-the-authors-are-hoping/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Proposed rule FRE 502&#8217;s goal is to limit the possible waiver of privileged attorney-client and attorney work-product material, but the underlying drive behind the amendment is to reduce the cost of electronic discovery.&#160;More specifically, the bill aims to reduce the costs of pouring over each document, file and email to determine whether that data contains [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cybercrimelaw.org/2007/12/16/proposed-fre-502-is-good-for-electronic-discovery-but-it-is-not-going-to-drastically-reduce-the-cost-of-litigation-as-the-authors-are-hoping/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>British Authorities: Insult to Injury</title>
		<link>http://www.cybercrimelaw.org/2007/11/28/british-authorities-insult-to-injury/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cybercrimelaw.org/2007/11/28/british-authorities-insult-to-injury/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 20:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dm</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Identity Theft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cybercrimelaw.org/2007/11/28/british-authorities-insult-to-injury/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I resisted writing about the British Tax Authorities&#8217; blunder disclosed last week when they lost two CDs full of sensitive information (bank accounts and social benefits information) of 25 million UK families.&#160; The story received enough mainstream press attention and I was afraid that many of our readers are starting to suffer from &#34;breach fatigue&#34; [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cybercrimelaw.org/2007/11/28/british-authorities-insult-to-injury/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Introduction to James Paulick</title>
		<link>http://www.cybercrimelaw.org/2007/11/27/introduction-to-james-paulick/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cybercrimelaw.org/2007/11/27/introduction-to-james-paulick/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 14:44:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dm</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[About]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Misc]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cybercrimelaw.org/2007/11/27/introduction-to-james-paulick/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[James Paulick, currently pursuing a Juris Doctor decree at Duquesne University in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, will be joining us in writing and contributing to this site.&#160; James received his Bachelor of Science in Computer Science from Wheeling Jesuit University and his interests include digital evidence reliability in cybercrimes and property rights in virtual words.&#160;
We are happy [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cybercrimelaw.org/2007/11/27/introduction-to-james-paulick/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TXJ Costs Continue Increasing</title>
		<link>http://www.cybercrimelaw.org/2007/11/15/txj-costs-continue-increasing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cybercrimelaw.org/2007/11/15/txj-costs-continue-increasing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 16:41:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dm</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Breaches]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cybercrimelaw.org/2007/11/15/txj-costs-continue-increasing/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We wrote in May, under the title &#34;Cost of Insecurity&#34; about TJX Companies&#8217; costs in connection with the security breach suffered in 2003/2004.&#160; In a footnote in its November 13 earnings announcement (Edgar report), TXJ increased its estimate of pre-tax charges for the credit card breach to $216 million (compare with the August estimate of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cybercrimelaw.org/2007/11/15/txj-costs-continue-increasing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
